The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant (one year of imprisonment without prison labor) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the crime of this case and the reflection of the wrongness of the defendant, the economic situation of the defendant is difficult, the support of his family, and the agreement with some victims, are favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case results in the death of the victim D while the vehicle of the defendant's driver is deprived of brooms, and the central line is invaded, resulting in the death of the victim D by taking the vehicle of the victim.

In addition, the damage is not deemed to have been fully recovered, such as the defendant deposits for the bereaved family members of the victim D or fails to reach an agreement, until the trial of the party.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings and records, such as the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.