1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Of the plaintiffs' lawsuits, it is about 28,000,000 won on November 25, 2014.

1. The reasons why this Court shall explain this part of the facts are added to Section 4(3) of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows, and to Section 6(e) of the same paragraph.

(f) The following is the same as the entry in the corresponding part except for the addition of a claim, and thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

4. (3) (4) The Defendant supplied electric wires, etc. to A by October 2014 and was not reimbursed KRW 146,941,592 for the supply of the goods.

(f) On November 25, 2014, the first instance court and the first instance trial co-Defendant KS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ASEAN Electric”) stored the total amount of KRW 88,00,000 among the supply price of KRW 231,439,230, and the amount of KRW 88,000 among the supply price of KRW 19,72,592, KRW 50,000 among the supply price of KRW 90,72,592, and KRW 30,000 among the supply price of KRW 30,00,00,000 among the supply price of KRW 90,72,592, from November 10, 2014 to November 19, 2014; and stored the total amount of KRW 40,093,247 in cash to the Asian Electric Cable Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul Electric Co. 15, 2014>

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiffs, around October 2014, failed to pay promissory notes issued by a trader, and met the first default. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant, etc., a trader, constituted a bond group and discussed the normalization of management and the method of debt repayment. As such, the Defendant was well aware of the Plaintiff’s ability to pay, debt status, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant has been paid a debt through an individual negotiation with A, received a payment in kind as an inventory, and made a claim against the customer.