1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. From April 20, 199, the Plaintiff, who is carrying on cargo transportation services after registering as a business operator, entered into an entrustment management agreement with the instant goods distribution company and operated the said vehicle on November 28, 2002, while voluntarily cancelling the said vehicle (export cancellation).

B. On November 22, 2002, the Plaintiff purchased the instant automobile, and entered into a new entrustment management contract with the instant goods distribution company on December 2, 2002, and entered into a new entrustment management contract with the instant goods, and entered into the entrustment management contract, and subsequently terminated the entrustment management contract. On April 26, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into the entrustment management contract with the Sungju Plastic Co., Ltd., and entered into the entrustment management contract with the said company on the transfer of the instant goods, and carried on cargo transport business by attaching the vehicle number “B” (hereinafter “the instant vehicle number”).

C. On November 2, 2010, the Defendant purchased approximately 11,086,957 won per vehicle number when taking over eight vehicle numbers including the instant vehicle numbers owned by Sung Plastic Co., Ltd., and purchased approximately 11,086,957 won per vehicle.

On November 30, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a new entrustment contract with the Defendant for truck management and operation of the instant motor vehicle (hereinafter “instant entrustment contract”) (hereinafter “instant entrustment contract”), and agreed to the effect that “In any case, the Defendant’s right of license (T/E) under the amended Trucking Transport Business Act, which is the Defendant’s property right under the said Act, shall not be required to transfer, and shall be returned to the Defendant at the same time as the termination of the entrustment management contract. The Plaintiff shall, if necessary, pay the amount requested by the Defendant (as at the time of distribution), and purchase at a cost.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1 to 8 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. It contains the terms that the instant entrustment contract will be terminated in determining the principal claim.