1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2.(a)

The defendant dated February 28, 2017 against the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant’s affiliated status as the parties (hereinafter “Defendant’s University”)

(2) On September 1, 201, the Plaintiff was appointed as a professor in exclusive charge of education at the International Language Education Center at Defendant University (Non-standing faculty).

On March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff was appointed as a full-time lecturer (full-time teacher) at the ELP College of the Defendant University on July 22, 2012, and the name of full-time lecturer was abolished by the Higher Education Act.

On March 1, 2013, the Plaintiff was reappointed as an assistant professor at the ELP university of the Defendant university. On March 1, 2015, the Plaintiff was reappointed as an assistant professor at the same university of the same faculty on March 1, 2015, and the period of reappointment expired on February 28, 2017.

B. The Defendant notified the Plaintiff in October 2016 that the period of reappointment expires and that the Plaintiff may apply for deliberation on the re-election of the first semester up to October 28, 2016. The Plaintiff applied for deliberation on October 24, 2016. (2) On January 6, 2017, the Defendant’s university notified the Plaintiff of the suspension of reappointment due to “non-recommended of major” and notified the Plaintiff of the suspension of reappointment on January 25, 2017.

3) On January 25, 2017, the Defendant’s university deliberated on the reappointment of the Plaintiff at the 393th Correction Teachers’ Personnel Committee held on January 25, 2017, and decided not to re-appoint the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff failed to meet the requirements of Article 9(1)2 of the Foreign Full-time Teachers’ Personnel Committee Regulations, which was held on February 15, 2017 and the board of directors held on February 23, 2017, pursuant to the resolution of the said Correction Teachers’ Personnel Committee, the Plaintiff failed to meet the requirements of “person who was recommended to be re-appointed in the major area” under Article 9(1)2 of the said Regulations.