1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: The real estate listed in the Appendix 1 list;

B. Defendant C.

1. The facts falling under any of the following subparagraphs may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence 1 to 7 and 11 to 15 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply):

The plaintiff is a maintenance and improvement project association established to implement a redevelopment project with the area of 80,836 square meters in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and was authorized to establish an association on February 1, 2008 by the head of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the "head of Gwanak-gu").

B. The head of Gwanak-gu approved the Plaintiff’s project implementation on November 12, 2009 and approved May 22, 2014 (amended). On February 17, 2015, the head of Gwanak-gu approved the management and disposition plan (hereinafter “instant management and disposition plan”) pursuant to Article 49(2) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), and publicly notified the above management and disposition plan in the official gazette pursuant to Article 49(3) of the same Act.

C. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet is located in the above project implementation district. Defendant B is located in the above project implementation district; Defendant C is the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1; Defendant D is the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3; Defendant E is the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 4; Defendant G is the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 5; Defendant H is the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 6; and Defendant J is the possession and possession of

On January 29, 2016, on March 18, 2016, the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City rendered a ruling of expropriation that the Plaintiff, a project implementer, expropriates the land and goods within the project area including each real estate listed in the separate sheet for the instant improvement project, and pays compensation for losses to its owners (hereinafter “instant ruling”). The Plaintiff deposited each compensation for losses to the Defendants as stated in the instant ruling as follows.

The amount of deposit on the defendant's deposit date shall be determined by the ruling of this case.