logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.07.21 2015구단2645
장해등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On June 20, 2008, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with the injury and disease of “the pelpelum of the pelpelum sae, the right bet and salted, the right bet and salted, the right bet and the right bet and the right bet and the first type of multiple saficial safics,” and was provided medical care as to each of the above injury and disease until March 31, 2014.

On May 12, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for disability benefits against the Plaintiff, but the Defendant: (a) determined that the Plaintiff’s right-hand part of the Plaintiff falls short of the disability grade standard; and (b) the Gal system disorder is remaining in the form of severe nephism on the water surface; and (c) rendered a disposition to determine the Plaintiff’s disability grade as class 15 (the left-hand part of the country) (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] A. A. 12, 14, and 16 (including various numbers), and the purport of the entire pleading as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate or not, falls under class 10 subparagraph 10 of class 10, where the exerciseable area of Gap's balance pipe or the first balance pipe is limited by not less than 1/2, and where the exerciseable area of Gap's balance pipe or the first balance pipe is limited by not less than 1/2, and it falls under class 13 subparagraph 13 of class 10.

In addition, the plaintiff's chronic disorder falls under class 15 of class 9, where the remaining labor service is limited to a considerable extent due to the function or mental function of the neurosis.

Therefore, even if the Plaintiff’s disability grade falls under at least Grade 9, the Defendant’s disposition of this case, which was decided as Grade 15, is unlawful.

Plaintiff

Medical opinions on the state of disability are limited by not less than 1/2 of the physical area in the right side of 2,3,4,5 heads of 2,3,4,5 heads of the plaintiffs' main doctor's opinion (hereinafter "B" on May 12, 2014), and the total of 60 degrees diagnosis reports (C Hospital on December 16, 2014) on the top of the upper right hand hand hand hand hand hand handba, which shows a change in the state of pain and evalacy and evalacy.

arrow