(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.05.16 2013고단762

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.05.16 2013고단762

사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the chief of night-time department in a game room, conspiredd to operate the game room together with the following: (a) the Defendant, as the chief of the game room, was responsible for the role of managing the game room by opposing the customers who are against disturbance in the game room and managing the game room; (b) C, by setting up the purchase and equipment of the game room; and (c) D, on condition that 100,000

The Defendant jointly recruited with C and D, from August 201 to August 30, 201 of the same month, in the “F” on the first floor of the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu building E, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant installed 90 game equipment, which did not receive a rating, and operated a speculative act using a speculative electronic device, by inserting KRW 10,000 in the said game machine to customers who found the place after employing employees, etc., and by inserting the number indicated on the screen at the beginning, when the number of customers who found the place coincide with the same number in width, length, or length, and the number indicated on the screen is accumulated, and by exchanging the accumulated points in cash to customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Copies and photographs of the police seizure record;

1. Application of statutes to a copy of the results of enforcement support;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Specific Crimes, Regulation of Speculative Acts, etc. concerning the Selection of Punishment, etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendant alleged that the game of this case was a chief of night or employee of the game of this case, and did not engage in activities to drive the reporter several times at the request of the unemployment week C, and did not operate the game of this case in collusion with C and D.

2. In light of the defendant's role recognized by the statement of the witness D, the defendant is liable for co-principals in the operation of the game of this case.

I would like.

참조조문

-사행행위 등 규제 및 처벌 특례법 제30조 제1항 제1호

-형법 제30조

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2014.12.02 2014고단3211

-대전지방법원 2013.01.10 2012고단2855

-대전지방법원 2012.11.01 2012고단1799

-대전지방법원 2013.06.13 2012고단3063

-대전지방법원 2014.01.17 2013고단3567