A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 10, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch of the Daegu District Court on January 10, 2007, and on January 6, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution.

On March 30, 2015, at around 22:25, the Defendant, as seen above, driven Cina car under the influence of alcohol content of about 700 meters from the front of the Binco road of the Gu-U.S. In order to the front road of the Gu-U.S. Mando-dong, Dong-dong, U.S. In addition, the Defendant driven Cina car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.149%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a driving under the influence of alcohol, inquiry into the results of the crackdown on driving under the influence of alcohol, and report on the state of standing;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records and other inquiries, investigation reports (reports on confirmation, etc. of the records of criminal acts of the same kind as a suspect), previous records of disposition and report on results of confirmation, two copies of summary order, one summary order, and one copy of judgment shall be applied;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da15488, Feb. 21, 2007) (see, 2008Da1448, Feb. 2, 2007);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;