beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, fines for negligence of 5,000,000, and Defendant C for six months, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A Co., Ltd. is a business owner who has been awarded a contract for cleaning the outer wall of E apartment in Yangsan-si to a building management company located in Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu. Defendant A is a real representative of B, who is a person in charge of the cleaning of the above glass hold, and Defendant C is a field safety manager in the above glass hold cleaning work as the head of the street team of B.
1. On November 21, 2014, Defendant A and Defendants C directed the victim F (39 years of age) who is a worker at the 107-dong roof (20th floor) of the above E apartment building, and managed and supervised the work of cleaning the above apartment building using a bridge (on the wall section used mainly in the work of outer wall of the high-rise building).
A person in charge of safety management shall, when he/she gets workers to work on the monthly vision, check and repair the status of attaching a log fixing the relevant monthly vision, the marks of each unit device, etc. before commencing the work, and immediately install a safety belt and a life rope in the monthly vision in order to prevent the fall risk of workers, and have a duty of care to instruct and supervise workers to wear a safety cap.
Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected to do so and did not check the attached condition of a fixed log and the scaming condition of each unit device before the thring work, and did not pay the safety cap to the victim. In the above thring of the month, the Defendants failed to install a safety belt and a life rope in the above string of the month, and caused an accident where the string of the above string of the month was cut off and fall by one of the work boards of the above string of the apartment, thereby getting out the balance of the victim.
Ultimately, Defendant A did not take necessary measures to prevent such risks, and at the same time, Defendants conspired to commit the said occupational negligence.