The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal argues that C did not have any perjury at the seat of the chairer or the chairer, and that C did not have any perjury, but only the Defendant’s wife and the Defendant’s wife and the R’s relative S, among those at the scene of the appeal, did not appear despite C’s intention, and the purport of JI (employee) HHG (victim’s relative behavior)’s statement is that H was injured because C was fit for the chairer at which C had suffered.

In addition, even if the situation at the time is very confused, C has become a suspect at least three times, so the argument that the defendant did not see it cannot be accepted. Therefore, the defendant can be recognized as having made a false statement contrary to memory for C.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles.

2. Determination

A. On January 10, 2013, the Defendant was present at the court of Seoul Eastern District Court No. 8, 2012, the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 680-22, 2013, and took an oath as a witness of the case of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) against the above court’s 2012 and 2498C.