logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.07.11 2012고단2402
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A from January 23, 200 to July 201, a person who works as a branch office of the Victim C Limited Company (hereinafter referred to as the "C") and manages all the affairs such as fund management and enforcement, etc., was sentenced to six years from the Incheon District Court to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) at the Incheon District Court on February 14, 201, and is currently pending in the appellate court at the Seoul High Court. Defendant B is a person who has served as a driver of the Defendant A in the transportation department from January 2008 to July 201, and was sentenced to the imprisonment with prison labor for eight months from the Incheon District Court on June 23, 2011 and was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for occupational embezzlement, etc. at the Incheon District Court on February 14, 2012, and is still pending in the appellate court at the present trial.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. around May 2010, Defendant A instructed Defendant A to forge a pre-tax contract as if he leased the office of the CCheongju Branch in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C branch office at the office of the C branch office in Gangnam-gu.

On May 17, 2010, Defendant B, using a computer at the office of the Seoul branch office above C, printed out the column of the real estate site for the commercial lease contract by stating the “Yongbuk-do Petition E,” “F,” “C,” and “C,” in the column of the location of the real estate for the commercial lease contract site, and affixed the seal of the F’s name, which was arbitrarily dismissed on the name of the said F.

As a result, the Defendants, in collusion, forged a commercial charter contract in the name of F, which is a private document related to rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of uttering, and forged a private document in Chapter 65, including a housing charter contract, a commercial charter contract, and a receipt, respectively, from May 7, 2010 to January 20, 201.

B. Defendant A on May 17, 2010 at the event of the above investigation document.

arrow