logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2015.07.14 2014가단16957
임금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 13,520,00 for the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); (b) KRW 2,325,00 for the appointed Party C; and (c) KRW 10,575,00 for the appointed Party D; and

Reasons

1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3; evidence Nos. 4-1 to 4; Gap evidence Nos. 5, 6, 7; Eul evidence No. 1; Eul evidence No. 2-1 to 2-1; Eul evidence Nos. 3; Eul evidence Nos. 4 and 5-2; Eul evidence Nos. 6-1, 2, and 3; Eul evidence Nos. 6-1, 2, and 3; witness and I’s testimony.

The Defendant re-subcontracted the portion of the windows, metals, and glass construction among the new construction works of J University Muian Researchdong, to I who run the Changho Construction Project on March 23, 2013 with the trade name of "K," "K," which is the contractor.

B. I again subcontracted part of the subcontracted construction from the Defendant to H with the trade name of “L” (hereinafter “instant construction work”), and H, as the team leader, employed the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) as the team leader, and did not pay wages as indicated below.

Workers’ unpaid wages 1 Plaintiff (Appointed Party) from July 15, 2013 to October 23, 2013, 2013, 200 KRW 2,325,00,00 from September 3, 2013 to October 23, 2013, to October 23, 2013, or KRW 3,000 from July 15, 2013 to October 10, 23, 2013; KRW 4,000 from July 22, 2013 to October 25, 2013 to July 25, 2013; KRW 325,000 from July 25, 2013 to KRW 13,00 from July 29, 2013 to 13,03; KRW 130,000 from July 13, 201 to 18;

C. I or H operated a personal enterprise related to construction, but did not register construction business under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry.

H and the Defendant’s representative director M received a summary order of KRW 5,00,000,000, and KRW 300,000,000, respectively, for the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Defendant’s representative director, respectively.

M does not request a formal trial against the above summary order, and the above summary order becomes final and conclusive, and H makes an application for formal trial.

arrow