beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the amount ordered below.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff operates a human resources office that introduces human resources from the name of "F" in the name of "D buildings and E" in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
B. At the Defendant’s request, from December 18, 2016 to December 30, 2016, the Plaintiff sent more than 40 persons to the site of the 2 and 3rd floor interior construction of the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Building (hereinafter “instant construction”) for construction work for C on the said site.
C. The sum of the wages of the figures stated in the foregoing Paragraph (b) is KRW 7,228,00. The Plaintiff paid all the wages to the above figures around December 30, 2016. However, the Plaintiff received only KRW 2,640,000 from the Defendant on December 23, 2016 and received only KRW 2,640,000 in total from the Defendant on December 31, 2016.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 4 (including virtual number) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. (1) The Plaintiff asserts that, if the Defendant sent his portion of the instant construction work, he would be jointly and severally liable with C to compensate for the wage, and that he sent his portion to the instant construction site, the Defendant should jointly and severally pay his portion of wages with C.
(2) As to this, the Defendant asserts that he only introduced the Plaintiff operating the Manpower Office to I while working as a worker at the construction site of this case, and that the Plaintiff should receive the wages of his father from the H president I.
(b) The statement of the payment of the construction cost: The order office for the interior construction of the G Building: He (Representative I) promises to pay the construction cost in KRW 00,000 to B by January 24, 2017 at the above site.
(Period of promise) On January 18, 2017, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, I, i.e., the name of “H”, i.e., each of which was signed by 24:0 p.m., each of which was signed by 1:0 p.m. (1) and the written evidence No. 1, 2017, may recognize the fact that I, who operates the interior company, prepared and sent to the Defendant the following “written