1. The real estate listed in attached Table 1 is owned by the Plaintiff, and the real estate listed in attached Table 2 is the Defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 27,233m2 of the F forest land in Go Chang-gun, Go Chang-gun, North Korea before division was divided into each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

B. Of each real estate listed in the separate sheet, the Plaintiff owns 8/12 shares, Defendant B’s shares, Defendant C’s shares, 1/12 shares, and Defendant E’s shares, 2/12 shares, respectively.

C. However, there was no agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the method of dividing the instant real estate.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of the instant real estate, may file a judicial claim against the Defendants in accordance with Article 269(1) of the Civil Act.

B. Furthermore, considering the circumstances such as health team, Gap evidence No. 3 and the overall purport of the pleadings as to the method of partition, and the situation of the real estate of this case, which can be known by the plaintiff as to the method of partition, the judgment was rendered that the plaintiff owned the real estate listed in attached Form No. 1, and the defendants and the remaining co-owners of the real estate listed in attached Table No. 2 are divided into ownership by share ratio, and the real estate listed in attached Table No. 1 among the real estate listed in attached Table No. 2 is owned by the plaintiff, and it is appropriate that the real estate listed in attached Table No. 2 is divided into the real estate in attached Table No. 1 and No. 1/4 shares, defendant C 1/4 shares, and defendant E 2/4 shares in kind, which were brought by the plaintiff against the defendants and the remaining co-owners at the time.

3. According to the conclusion, the instant real estate is to be divided in kind as above.