logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2016.10.07 2016허3471
등록무효(디)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) The registration number (No. 2) 1)/ the filing date: B/C/D2 of the registered design: A description and drawings of the design in attached Form 1: The defendant;

나. 비교대상디자인들 비교대상디자인 출처 도면 1 갑 제5, 6호증: 2006. 7.경 라이젠탈사가 발행한 카탈로그에 게재된 ‘수납함(storage box)’ 2 갑 제7호증: 월간 롯데홈쇼핑 2008년 9월호에 게재된 ‘리빙박스’ 3 갑 제8호증: 2010. 7. 9. 네이버 블로그에 게재된 ‘락앤락 리빙박스 데코’ 4 갑 제9호증: 2010. 7. 10. 네이버 카페 ‘F’에 게재된 ‘정리함’ 5 갑 제10호증: 2010. 4. 12. 중국 인터넷 사이트(http://www.sina.com.cn)에 게재된 ‘수납함(收納盒)’ 비교대상디자인들은 모두 이 사건 등록디자인의 출원 전에 공지된 ‘보관함(수납함)’에 관한 디자인에 관한 것으로, 그 출처와 도면은 아래 표와 같다.

C. On March 3, 2014, the Plaintiff filed for a registration invalidation trial prior to the instant trial decision and the previous final and conclusive trial decision against the Defendant with the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the ground that the registered design of this case is similar to the comparative design 2, and that the registered design of this case constitutes a design that can be easily created by a person with ordinary knowledge in the field to which the design pertains (hereinafter “ordinary designer”) by combining the design 1, 2, and 3, and thus, the registration should be invalidated.

B. On July 7, 2014, the Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered a trial ruling dismissing the registered design of this case on the ground that the registered design of this case is not similar to the comparative design 2, but is not a design that can be easily created by combining the design 1, 2, 3, etc., and the above trial ruling can file a lawsuit seeking revocation of the trial ruling.

arrow