logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.22 2016가단1920
추심금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 966,634 and KRW 5% per annum from January 22, 2016 to July 22, 2016, and complete payment from the next day.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) leased KRW 103 of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Land Building C (hereinafter “instant building”); (b) KRW 15 million of the lease deposit; (c) KRW 1100,000 of the monthly rent; and (d) the lease term up to March 19, 2015; (c) separately pays value-added tax, water, electricity, gas, etc.; and (d) separately pays the brokerage commission and the burden of the official room before the maturity.

B. The Plaintiff filed an application with the Seoul Central District Court 20,032,400 won for the attachment and collection order concerning the claim to return the lease deposit that B had against the Defendant based on the No. 134, 2014, based on the No. 134, which was executed by a notary public against B, and the claim amount was KRW 20,032,40,00,000. The said court rendered a ruling of accepting the claim on June 15, 2015, and the said ruling was served on the Defendant around that time.

C. B delivered the instant building to the Defendant around November 30, 2015.

On January 21, 2016, the Defendant deposited KRW 5,215,930 as Seoul Central District Court No. 1519 in accordance with Article 248(1) of the Civil Execution Act on the grounds that the attachment of the Plaintiff’s claim and the provisional attachment by a third party were concurrent.

E. The above D.

The Seoul Central District Court D with respect to the claim deposit was in progress, and the Plaintiff was distributed KRW 3,286,825 in the said distribution procedure.

[Grounds for Recognition: Entry in Evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff received the instant claim seizure and collection order regarding the lease deposit against the Defendant in B, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff, a collection right holder, KRW 20,032,40 with the amount collected, and delay damages.

B. (1) Determination is based on the following facts: (a) the Plaintiff was ordered to seize and collect the instant claim amounting to KRW 20,032,400.

arrow