logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2012.12.27 2012고단341
사기미수등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and by imprisonment for one year; and

2. However, in respect of Defendant B, this paragraph is applicable.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2012 Highest 341"

1. On September 201, Defendant A attempted to commit fraud was the head of the insurance solicitor team of the interesting country fire D branch, and Defendant A collected the said vehicle at a high price by accepting the said vehicle and selling it at a higher price with the owner of the KS7 car owned by the said KS7 car. However, when F was unable to receive the sale price of KRW 24 million desired by the F, Defendant A would be able to attract F’s parents and F, known to F at any method, to enter into a large number of future insurance policies according to the sales price of the vehicle at F’s desired amount. Defendant B and F, his subordinate staff, with G, who was an employee of the said K7 car company, was aware of, and collected the amount desired by F by receiving insurance money from the F.

On December 2, 2011, at around 23:55, Defendant A driven the said K7 vehicle on the way corresponding to the H-Si Kimcheon-si H restaurant and parked the said vehicle. In other words, Defendant B received the insurance accident to the effect that, while Defendant A and Defendant B suffered the back portion of the said K7 vehicle’s left side in the front side of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the said K7 car, Defendant A, along with G, had a network around the accident while Defendant A was in the accident, rather than the network around the accident site immediately after Defendant A was in the accident site as seen above, Defendant A was in the cell phone victim corporation and the insurance company called “an automobile of the vehicle while driving a stroke while driving a stroke,” Defendant B received the insurance accident to the effect that “the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle while driving a stroke.”

As such, the Defendants conspired with G in order to deceiving the victim and receive KRW 26,094,376 in aggregate with the insurance proceeds, such as vehicle repair expenses, etc. around that time, but did not lead to a false receipt of an accident, and did not lead to an attempted crime.

2...

arrow