logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.12.13 2018가단71899
공유물분할
Text

1. Of the 4,5, 6, 7, 41, 40, 39, 37, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, and 44 of the annexed drawing among the 4, 5, 6, 7, 41, 30, 39, 37, 35, 34, 33, and

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants share 4383 square meters in G-si and 3131 square meters in total (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”) at the ratio of 1/6 each, respectively.

B. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants did not reach an agreement on the method of dividing the instant land.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants did not reach an agreement on the division of the instant land. As such, the Plaintiffs may file a claim against the Defendants to divide the instant land.

In addition, as seen earlier, the aforementioned evidence and evidence Nos. 2 and 3 (including paper numbers), the result of the request for measurement and appraisal to the head of the office of net branch office of the Korea National Land Information Corporation in this Court, and the overall purport of the pleadings, as revealed in full view of the location, shape, area, utilization status, and each share ratio of the plaintiffs and the defendants in the above land, it is reasonable to divide the following parts into the Plaintiffs, (a), (c), (b), and (d) into the Defendants.

3. In conclusion, the land of this case shall be divided as above, and litigation costs shall be borne individually, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow