1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 10, 200, the Plaintiff: (a) supplied each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “C”) from C (hereinafter “instant land”); and (b) contracted the structural part of the structural part of the structural part of the structural part of the structural part of the Construction Work for the Construction of the Construction of the Crogate on each ground (hereinafter “instant land”); (c) from October 15, 2000 to December 30, 2001; and (d) commenced the said construction work on September 2001; and (e) began the construction work on the part of C.

B. On September 2002, the Plaintiff acquired a business right related to the instant construction from C with D around September 2002, and D agreed to continue the instant construction after establishing a separate corporation after receiving a successful bid for each of the instant land.

D) Accordingly, upon receiving a successful bid for each of the instant lands under the name of the Defendant, which is the subject of a sale on December 6, 2002, D had completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant on December 18, 2002, and established E Co., Ltd. (E) on January 30, 203 and appointed as the representative director.

On April 19, 2003, the Plaintiff received necessary documents from C to change the name of the owner, and changed the name of the owner of the instant construction work to E.

C. However, the instant construction has not been resumed, and the Plaintiff and D, around June 9, 2009, agreed to sell each of the instant land and the instant construction-related business rights en bloc and settle their respective inputs with the financial resources (hereinafter “instant settlement agreement”), but the sale of the instant land was finally non-consumed as a policeman on July 2009.

D From December 16, 2007 to December 22, 2007, the construction site of this case dismantled a fry house of a structure on the ground, and then disposed of at will the iron bars and the adjacent thereto, which were loaded in the steel bars and the adjacent thereto. On February 2008, the construction site of this case removed the site office and the warehouse, and disposed of at will the steel frys and fixtures that were loaded in the steel fry and the adjacent thereto.

On May 24, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a claim for damages with respect to D’s above disposal act.