logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.06.08 2018고단1320
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 22, 2018, the Defendant does not pay a charge even if he/she arrived at a destination after he/she was aboard the C cab, around 21:44, in front of the Seoul Western-gu B, Seoul.

“A” means: (a) upon receipt of the report of 112 reported by the 112 taxi engineer D and sent to the site, the E police box F, the G (27) for the Defendant to pay a taxi fee and require the Defendant to present an identification card; and (b) whether the son, n, would grow up to be subject to restrictions;

The death will be discarded.

“The victim’s head was at least three times in drinking.”

In addition, the victim's bucks prices three times the victim's bucks to arrest the Defendant due to damage to public goods, etc., and assaulted four times the victim's bucks to capture the Defendant inside the vehicle after the bucking into the back seat of the patrol vehicle, and then the victim's bucks to remove the Defendant inside the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning reporting processing and arresting flagrant offenders.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time, time, and place set forth in the above Paragraph 1 above, and caused the Defendant to break up the above inquiry machine in order for the Defendant to have a slope F, who was next to the Defendant, by taking a bath and assault as above, do so by making a portable inquiry with him/her, and to fall on the ground floor by making a portable steering session in his/her hand, and to cut off the above inquiry machine on the ground. The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and carried in to Embsing for Embs at a price at a number of times in order to prevent the safety protection in the vehicle by making it possible for him/her from being transported to Embsing.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the market price's aesthetic things used by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to crimes that damage public goods);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act for criminal facts (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act shall be punished by imprisonment, respectively.

arrow