1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the plaintiff B's claim expanded from the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The following facts in the course of the ruling do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 1-1, 5, 9, and 2-1, 5, 9, 3-1, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2, and 2-1, 2-1, and 2-2, and the results of the appraisal by the first instance court appraiser F (hereinafter "court appraiser"):

Project approval and public notice - Project name: D Housing Site development project (fiveths) - E publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on February 6, 2009 - Defendants

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on June 24, 201 - Land to be expropriated: The following table shall be the same as the list of land to be expropriated:

(hereinafter referred to as “H land, etc.”) - Compensation for losses: The following table is the same as the statement in the amount of expropriation adjudication:

- Commencement date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation for a corporation and an appraisal corporation for the first day of August 17, 201;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection (hereinafter “adjudication on an objection”) dated November 18, 201 - Contents of adjudication: The following table is written:

- Certified public appraisal corporations: Ray Appraisal Corporations and Uniform Certified Public Appraisal Corporations

(d) Results of the appraisal by the court appraiser (hereinafter referred to as the "court appraisal") - Contents of the appraisal: The following statements are as follows:

[Attachment] The plaintiff 200, 200, 202, 202, 791, 200, 205, 298, 309, 407, 40345, 8068, 800, 800, 90, 90, 209, 209, 200, 209, 200, 209, 200, 209, 200, 200, 30, 209, 20, 209, 200, 20, 200, 30, 200, 20, 209, 200, 20, 306, 209, 200, 207, 2084, 208, 205, 207, 2084, 2085, 2006, 2007

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. Plaintiff A’s assertion 1 H, I, J, and K are originally one parcel.