beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff, Defendant D’s KRW 5,817, Defendant E’s KRW 3,900, and each of the above amounts, Defendant D’s period from September 17, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendants listen to the statements, such as the need for a benefit passbook from a person who has been seeking through the Internet job-seeking site, while seeking a job, and sent the Defendant’s deposit passbook and cash card to the person who has been unaware of the name.
B. In order to sell real estate owned by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff advertised it on the “intersection”’s daily information book, and, in order to purchase real estate from those in the name of the person in the name of the Plaintiff, the appraiser must make an appraisal, and the appraisal cost and fee for the appraisal should be paid, and around July 10, 2014, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 5,980,00 to the Korea Telecommunication Account under Defendant B’s name, KRW 6,380,00 to the Gyeongnam Bank Account under Defendant C’s name, and KRW 5,60,000 to the national bank account under Defendant D’s name, and KRW 6,380,000 to the account under Defendant E’s name.
C. The money remitted to the Plaintiff immediately after the remittance of each of the above money was withdrawn as follows:
1) The Plaintiff, immediately after remitting KRW 5,980,00 to Defendant B, was fully withdrawn KRW 5,980,000 that was remitted. 2) The Plaintiff, immediately after remitting KRW 6,380,00 to Defendant C, withdrawn KRW 6,00,000, and KRW 3,80,000 was entirely remitted to Defendant D.
3) The Plaintiff withdrawn KRW 500,000 immediately after remitting KRW 5,60,00 to Defendant D, and as seen above, KRW 9,71,00,00,000, which included KRW 60,000,000 remaining in the account in the name of Defendant C, was withdrawn, and KRW 5,817 ( KRW 6,18 - KRW 301,00 which remains in the account before the Plaintiff remitting) remains. 4) The Plaintiff was released KRW 6380,00 immediately after the Plaintiff wired KRW 6380,00 to Defendant E, and KRW 3,90,00 were remitted to F, and KRW 3,00 were left.
On the other hand, Defendant B and C confirmed the phrase “where transferring the passbook and cash card, they may be liable for damages and may be punished by the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.”