logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.29 2015가단164060
양수금 등
Text

1. The Defendants jointly deliver the buildings listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

1. Claim against the defendant B

(a) Indication of claims: It is consistent with paragraph (1) of this Article;

(b) Grounds for recognition: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 through 3, 2, and 3-6 against defendant A, facts as to the reasons for the claim in the annexed sheet can be acknowledged.

According to the above facts, the lease contract of this case was terminated upon the expiration of the term of validity, and the plaintiff, the transferee of the claim to return the lease deposit of the defendant A, is also recognized as necessary to exercise the right to subrogation of the right to claim the delivery of the building listed in the attached list against the defendant A of SP in order to seek the fulfillment of the claim to return the lease deposit against the defendant A. Therefore, the defendant A is jointly obligated to deliver the building listed in the attached list to SP in order

The plaintiff's claim against the defendant A is justified and accepted.

arrow