logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고정431
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BE-ray vehicle.

On June 29, 2017, around 06:45, the Defendant was driving along the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government front road along the one lane from the intersection at the entrance of Kimpo Airport to the international line. On June 29, 2017, the two lanes, which is the place of the accident, increased to four lanes, the Defendant was driving along the bend road along the right side of the road.

Defendant is proceeding on the two-lanes while proceeding as above;

D(42) E-Engines in D(42) changed course toward one lane, and there was a traffic accident that contacts the right side of the motor bicycle with X-T Hand on the left side of the bicycle.

As a result, D and motor bicycle has lost the center and passed on the road, and D had D leave the accident site without taking necessary measures at the time of the occurrence of the traffic accident, even though the accident, such as the injury of breast booms, which requires treatment for about two weeks, and the hindrance of traffic flow caused by motor device bicycle.

2. The Defendant was consistently aware from the investigative agency to this court that D himself was dissatisfying, and the fact that the accident occurred due to contact with his driver was dissatisfying.

The above facts charged are denied by asserting.

Therefore, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, and ① the place where the above traffic accident occurred was covered by the steel board on the floor due to the construction work, and there was no accident.

Even though noise and vibration are very high, in light of the degree of the shock of the above traffic accident, the defendant saw that the shock or collision occurred due to the above traffic accident.

It is difficult to conclude, ② The defendant does not seem to do any abnormal behavior before and after the collision and proceeds naturally.

arrow