Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 5. 10. 14:20경 서울 종로구 B에 있는 C매장 앞 횡단보도에서 서울 종로구청 소속 주무관 D가 피고인에게 공무원증을 제시하며 직원과 피고인이 운영하는 노점에 대한 수거 업무를 개시하려하자 위 D의 공무원증을 낚아채어가고, 위 D에게 “우리 아들 대학만 떨어져 봐라, 너는 죽여버릴꺼야 개새끼야, 너희가 찍을 까봐 나도 카메라 사뒀어 여기 다 들어 있어. 이 개새끼들아.”라고 소리치며 피고인 소유인 비디오카메라를 공무집행 중인 현장 바닥에 던져 깨뜨리고, D의 지시로 채증을 위해 현장을 핸드폰으로 촬영하고 있던 E의 손을 치는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown of the old public official's occupation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigation report (the suspect inherited under the same jurisdiction, the photographing of motion pictures);

1. Application of the video CD-related statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, the selection of fines [the act of assault in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties as stipulated in Article 136 of the Criminal Act refers to the act of exercising tangible power against a public official who performs official duties, and the act of assault is directly or indirectly conducted by a public official (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 70Do561, May 12, 1970; 81Do326, Mar. 24, 1981). The defendant's act of flacing E's hand taken by a video camera at the site where D was under official duties by destroying it on the floor or destroying it on the site with D's instructions, and therefore, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is established]

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;