Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who is a defendant A shall lend a check, etc., which is an access medium to electronic finance, while demanding or promising to receive the price;

Nevertheless, the defendant, on September 17, 2016, will pay KRW 3 million per month on the face of the head of the Tong by lending the head of the Tong.

“On the same day, Kwikset Service Articles 8-2(c) and 8-2(3) of the Republic of Korea, Kwikset Service Articles and 8-2(3) of the Republic of Korea: (a) provide Kwikset Service Articles 8-2(3) and 18-2(3).

2. No person who Defendant B shall lend a check, etc., which is an access medium to electronic finance, while demanding or promising to receive the price.

Nevertheless, on September 19, 2016, the Defendant paid 10% of the trading amount per day on September 19, 2016, as allowances, to reduce the tax imposed on the company.

“On September 20, 2016, at around 14:00 on September 20, 2016, 1 e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed e-mailed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Copy of the police statement made to F;

1. A detailed statement of transactions of deposits and withdrawals and replies to financial institutions;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a statement of transaction in one bank account in B;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition (Defendant B)

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was the bank account that the Defendants transferred to the Defendants to commit a financial fraud, and the organization of the phishing crime committed a financial fraud, and the victims actually suffered the responsibility of the Defendants.