logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.09.25 2017고단1931
개인정보보호법위반
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B It is the real representative of G, a sales company that solicits the Internet service with the head office F and 1806, and Defendant A was responsible for the management of personal information at the G call center, a corporation, G, the former business entity of G, and the Defendants are personal information processors who collect and store another person’s name, address, resident registration number, contact number, etc. for the purpose of attracting subscription to the Internet service of G for the purpose of attracting subscription to the Internet service of G.

No personal information manager shall acquire personal information by fraud or other improper means or methods.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, who are personal information managers, conspired to receive personal information from the owners who closed their business after operating the same kind of company with the aim of using them for attracting subscription to the Internet service of G Co., Ltd.

As a result, the Defendants acquired the x-cell file in which 1,985 personal information files are stored in the USB joints, even though they are well aware of the fact that the said G office located in the Government around June 30, 2015 provides meals and alcohol to the persons in distress and that there is no consent from the subjects of the personal information.

From October 15, 2012 to June 30, 2015, the Defendants conspired to acquire personal information as seen above, and 3,004,710 personal information was obtained by using a total of 3,004,710 personal information as indicated in the crime sight list, where the personal information file without the consent of the subject of the personal information was stored.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to H in the police statement protocol;

1. The I’s statement, investigation report (10250 on the screen page of the Mamsms, which is a public relations for the 10250 Internet entrance), each seizure protocol and list of seizure, investigation report (suspect A and G call center).

arrow