Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant F: (a) around 16:00 on October 10, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Daegu District Court located in the Daegu District Court located in 458-2 on the same day; (b) on October 10, 2016, the lower court held Defendant F in the instant case of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act against H No. 5030, 2012, as a witness.

In fact, the Defendant did not have any ever shown in I in 2010, and he received a receipt of 2 million won in I to deduct income at the end of the year, but the Prosecutor received the receipt of her 2 million won in order to deduct income at the end of the year.

When examining "," it is old and not easy to memory.

testimony “,” and in fact, in 2010, 2 million won (as stated in the receipt of donations) was issued.

“In the examination, I memory that “A accurate memory shall be the only extent to which I have known.”

The testimony was made.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. On October 17, 2016, Defendant B appeared as a witness in the instant case of violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act against H No. 5030 of the said court at the Daegu District Court located in 458-2, Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, 2016.

In fact, the Defendant did not have the intention to start with I in 2010, and the Defendant received the donation receipt from I to deduct the income from the settlement of accounts at the end of the year, but the prosecutor “the witness donated 2.1.50,000 won to I at the time of settlement of accounts at the end of the year 2009.

The report and the receipt of donations were made, and the 2009 question was asked as "I am appropriate for the enemy who paid the donations."

I testified that the amount should also be accurately memoryed and that "I actually ordered 2.4 million won in the settlement of the annual end of 2010."

In the Prosecutor’s Examination, “The amount shall be old and shall not be respected well.”

“The testimony was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

3. The Defendant D around November 14, 2016 around 14:00.