logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.12.24 2019나51651
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”). Defendant B is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff, and Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle without registration (hereinafter “Defendant”) (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

B. (1) On January 8, 2018, before the instant accident occurred, the prior vehicle used a two-lane road near Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si (F) around 18:29 on January 8, 2018 (hereinafter “the prior accident”). In the event that the prior vehicle used a two-lane road in the vicinity of Seopo-si, Seopo-si, in the course of driving a two-lane of the two-lane road from Manipo-si

2) Since the preceding accident was relatively minor, the preceding accident occurred and the preceding accident was moved to the road and parked to the farm outside the road, and only the defendant vehicle was parked in the same place.

3) G and the employees of the KF Center, who are the spouse of the driver of the GV, arrive at the site for the management of the accident and sent water signals to the vehicle following the Defendant. 4) On January 8, 2018, the Plaintiff’s vehicle used the same road on the one-lane of the same road on January 18, 2018, and opened the direction rapidly to the right side in order to find the vehicle late and prevent the collision. However, in the process, G, on the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was located on the other side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the two-lane side for the management of the preceding accident, was cut off as soon as possible, but was put on the right side part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

Plaintiff

차량은 G과 충돌한 직후 다시 급히 좌측으로 방향을 틀었는데, 도로 중앙선을 넘어가면서 맞은 편에서 진행하던 H 차량(이하 ‘피해차량 1’이라 한다)과 충돌하였고, 그로 인해 파손된 차량 파편물이 부근을 지나던 I 차량(이하 ‘피해차량 2’라 한다)에 튕겨져...

arrow