Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Minister of Health and Welfare, a Mayor/Do Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu shall take measures, such as hospitalized or isolation of persons suspected of having an infectious disease in an appropriate place for a fixed period, in order to prevent the spread of the infectious disease upon the outbreak of the infectious disease,

At around 12:30 on April 3, 2020, the Defendant contacted with Corrovi infection-19 disease-a9, the Busan Busan Busan Busan Busan Metropolitan Government Office, where the Defendant works. On April 7, 2020, the Defendant received a quarantine notice under the name of the head of Busan Metropolitan City Maritime Transportation Daegu B building, which is a residence, and the public official in charge of the Ministry of Maritime Transportation and Daegu Public Health and Health Center in (C) from the public official in charge of the public official in charge of the Busan Metropolitan City Maritime Transportation Daegu B building, which is a residence, and from April 6, 2020 to April 17, 2020.

Nevertheless, at around 11:15 on April 14, 2020, the Defendant violated the isolation measures by visiting the said apartment garbage separation and removal site for about 15 minutes in order to throw away food waste from the isolation place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. A public official's statement;

1. Notice on isolation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to confirm the fact-finding;

1. Article 79-3 of the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act, subparagraph 5 of Article 79-3 and subparagraph 3 of Article 47 of the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of the sentencing of the instant isolation order under Article 334(1) cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s liability for the crime of this case deviating from the place where the Defendant was designated to be isolated is too unusual at the time of the rapid spread of the Krona 19 virus and the resulting in the rapid apprehension of society.

However, it is recognized that the defendant's mistake is the primary offender, and the violation of isolation measures is once.