logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2018.10.18 2018고단568
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2004, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), etc. on the support of the Daegu District Court Kimcheon, and on August 21, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), etc. on the support of the Daegu District Court and the Mayor of the Daegu District Court, and on May 19, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving). On January 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of KRW 4 months with labor for a special assault from the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-cheon branch on the support of the Daegu District Court and completed the execution of the sentence in the Kimcheon District Court on May 19, 2016.

On July 31, 2018, at around 02:00, the Defendant driven a bareboat cargo vehicle with two ballon in the state of alcohol alcohol 0.152% from a section of approximately 1km to the front road of the ballon parking lot located in the Dongcheon-dong, Seocheon-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of the prohibition on driving under the Road Traffic Act, as a person who has violated the prohibition on driving under the same influence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Notice of the result of crackdown on driving drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (verification of the history of driving the same kind of drinking);

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the Defendant had several criminal records for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, he/she again committed the instant crime during the period of a separate repeated offense, despite the fact that he/she had several criminal records for the same kind of offense.

However, the fact that the defendant is aware of and against the time of committing the crime, and he does not drive the drinking again.

It is the fact that the children are supported and brought up after the divorce, and other matters are supported and raised.

arrow