A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2017, at around 12:20, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force between approximately 20 minutes of the disturbance, such as the victim’s “D cafeteria” in the Heak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Operation D Da, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, expressed the victim’s desire, changed the alcohol to the customers on other tables with large sounds, and enjoying the entrance in front of the entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C Police Statement Statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Relevant legal provisions for criminal facts, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act for the selection of punishment, reasons [the scope of recommended punishment] for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of business interference] shall interfere with the reduction area (one month to eight months] (including efforts taken by a special mitigation person], the non-exclusive punishment (including efforts taken to recover damage] (the decision of sentence] that is unfavorable to the defendant (the decision of sentence): Three times the history of being fined for the same kind of crime is three times, and there are many other records of being fined due to the crime of drinking, the crime of damage, etc.

o. Sentencing elements are recognized as erroneous and reflective. The injured party does not want to be punished. o and other sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are comprehensively taken into account, and the sentence is determined as ordered.