1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of confinement;

A. A public announcement of project approval: (a) A public announcement of the construction work for building roads B (hereinafter “instant project”): on August 9, 2012, 2012, the project implementer C, the Goyang-gu public announcement of the Goyang-si public announcement on July 12, 2013: Defendant 3) the Plaintiff owned the respective 1/6 shares, for the Goyang-gu Emyang-gu forest E 96m2, F forest land 231m2, G forest land, and 138m2 (hereinafter “each incorporated land”).

(A) is incorporated into the business area of the instant business

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion on expropriation as of January 21, 2014, the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Expropriation Decision 1: Each of the instant incorporated land ought to be evaluated as “site” depending on the actual use situation. In addition, each of the instant incorporated land owned by the Plaintiff should be deemed as “site.” In addition, each of the instant remaining land in the Goyang-si, Goyang-si, the Plaintiff owned 1/6 shares, 124 square meters of Han Forest, 15 square meters of I forest, J forest, 270 square meters of J forest, 279 square meters

(2) The Plaintiff’s assertion as to each of the remaining lands of this case is rejected, and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to each of the remaining lands of this case is accepted only with respect to the area of 15 square meters of 15 square meters of 15 square meters of 15 square meters of 15 square meters of 31,723,000 won of each of the incorporated lands of this case and 15 square meters of 31,723,00 won of 15 square meters of 15 square meters of 15 square meters of 31,00.

C. The Plaintiff’s assertion on July 17, 2014, the Central Land Expropriation Committee’s assertion 1: The content of the adjudication on expropriation: (a) is to additionally expropriate the area of 49m2 in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, and 59m2 in addition to the area of each remaining land of this case; (b) there is no dispute over the recognition of KRW 39,671,520 in the amount of compensation for expropriation of the area of 59m2 in the case of each incorporated land of this case; and (c) there is no dispute over the recognition of KRW 39,671,520 in the amount of compensation for expropriation of the area of 59m2 in the case of 59m2 in the case of the instant incorporated land of this case

2. Each of the instant incorporated land of this case, each of which was recognized by the Plaintiff’s assertion of objection, and the land incorporated into the instant incorporated land of 15 square meters or less of 15 square meters of Mayang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, and the said I land.