logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.04 2017가단5007357
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

In full view of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and the overall purport of the pleadings, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the unpaid principal and interest and delay damages, such as the statement in the purport of the claim.

The Defendant asserts to the effect that “the ten-year extinctive prescription for the instant claim has expired”.

However, according to each of the above evidence, it can be known that the expiration date of the lending period of the claim of this case was June 30, 2005, and the lawsuit of this case was filed for ten years thereafter, the extinctive prescription of the claim of this case was completed.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is justified.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow