(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.16 2015가단53499

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.16 2015가단53499

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,067,270 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from June 9, 2015 to June 16, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 9, 2015, at around 01:45, the Defendant used D vehicles in the vicinity of the area located as Cheongdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, to the Namdong-gu, Incheon, Seodong-gu, Incheon, and moved along with the Plaintiff while the dispute was brought against the Plaintiff, the Defendant committed assaulting the Plaintiff’s left knick with her head in the early glass, such as stringing her hair, her head, her head, her head, her head, her head, and preventing sound from spreading, and inflicted injury on the left 21 days by assaulting the Plaintiff’s head in the early glass in the state of her head debt, her back her back, and preventing sound from spreading.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

In relation to the instant accident, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including the branch numbers with which a branch number is attached), the result of the court's entrustment of physical examination to the three universities affiliated hospitals at the school of the year of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. We look at the occurrence of damages liability, and according to the above facts, the defendant committed a tort such as the accident in this case, and therefore, the plaintiff is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the above accident.

3. Scope of damages.

A. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in each statement of evidence No. 3-1 to No. 4, it is acknowledged that the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,567,270 to hospitalization and hospital treatment expenses, medicine expenses, etc. due to the instant accident.

B. solatium 2,500,000: The plaintiff's age, relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant, circumstances and results of the accident of this case, and other circumstances shown in the argument of this case

C. The defendant's assertion argues that the defendant should offset the negligence since the plaintiff's scam, frighting a mixed drinking, provided the cause of the accident of this case, and the result of the injury occurred due to his behavior.

Domins, B.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.01 2014가합36257

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.10 2014가단5304453

-전주지방법원군산지원 2015.01.27 2014가단1114

-울산지방법원 2018.06.27 2014가단8676

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.25 2016나32819