logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.13 2014노924
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of defendant's grounds for appeal: Unfair sentencing;

2. A review of the grounds for appeal is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant was a first offender; (b) the Defendant was given a mental diagnosis and treatment to prevent recidivism; and (c) the Defendant was punished by volunteer service activities; and (d) the Defendant agreed to donate to the Korean sexual assault counseling center, etc. instead of having difficulty in recovering damage to an unspecified victim; (b) on the other hand, it is recognized that, on the other hand, the Defendant taken the body of the female who was frightd in the same place as before the crime of this case, taken a video and deleted it later; and (c) the Defendant taken the body of the female who was fright at the same place as before the crime of this case as before the crime of this case, and then deleted it later; and (d) taking full account of all the sentencing conditions as indicated in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, occupation, family relationship, economic circumstances, and the circumstances after the crime of this case

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.

arrow