logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단1967
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving C and C 3 cargo vehicles.

On October 2, 2015, the Defendant came to proceed from the third parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel.

At the time, there was a vehicle waiting for signal at the front section of the defendant, so in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to properly manipulate the direction of the operation to prevent the accident and prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence, neglected to do so, committed an injury to the victim D (Woo, 47 years old) and the victim D and the victim F (F) in the front part of the 3rd vehicle in QM3 vehicle driving in QM3 vehicle in the front section of the Defendant’s front line, thereby causing injury to the victim D and the victim F (P 47 years old), which requires approximately two-day medical treatment, and at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the said QM3 vehicle with the repair cost of KRW 2,692,118 while destroying and damaging the said QM3 vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, on-site photographs, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Report on internal investigation:

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to damaged vehicles booms CDs;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the occupation of a person who does not take any measure after a traffic accident) of the relevant Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the defendant among the grounds for sentencing);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (resumed grounds for reduction of amount);

1. Protection observation, community service, and others;

arrow