The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment is publicly announced.

1. On March 25, 2015, the Defendants: (a) around 14:50 on March 25, 2015, on the part of the victim E in Gwangju-gu, the Defendants: (b) loaded the Defendant A’s Fsch Rexroth vehicle and opened the said cargo entrance and intruded the structure without the victim’s prior consent.

2. (1) The Defendants consistently asserted that the crime of intrusion upon a structure is not established, since the Defendants entered the victim with the permission of the victim to enter the instant bed cultivation house.

(2) The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court.

① Defendant B was recommended to invest in the new plant variety turf project developed by the victim through G, and the Defendant B left the instant turf turf with Gman and H on March 2015 with the victim’s guidance.

② In order to attract Defendant A’s investment, Defendant B agreed with Defendant A to visit the instant Pody Pody Pody Pody Pody with Defendant A, and called Defendant G on March 24, 2015 to the effect that “I sought an investment applicant, and now, I would like to go to the instant Pody Pody Pody Pody Pody.”

③ At this court, G testified that “I asked the victim to the above purport, and sent it to Defendant B’s intent. At present, I cannot go to the scene in Seoul, listen to the answer that I am going to the staff, and sent E’s intention by phoneing to Defendant B.” On March 2015, H, who visited Defendant B with Defendant B, visited Defendant B, and was using Defendant B’s office at the time of the visit to the instant office, stated that “B visited Defendant B, after having visited Defendant B from March 2015, she called for the instant Hadi Hadi cultivation Hadi, who called for the applicant to make an investment again.”

(4) Defendant A shall be a new variety developed by a victim from Defendant B.