The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error and the misapprehension of legal principle) found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged without any evidence, despite the absence of any damage to the victim’s vehicle by attaching a Stick for Violation of Motor Vehicle Parking Regulations on the victim’s vehicle. The lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles and misconception of facts.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the instant facts charged can be fully acknowledged.

1) The Defendant, after attaching a Stick in front of the victim’s vehicle, did her act of a speecher for about two seconds from the back side of the victim’s left side of the vehicle. The Defendant asserted that “Igri is well-known.” However, the Defendant’s above act is distinguishable from the Defendant’s act in that Igri is well-known by moving to the front side of the damaged vehicle and moving to the rear side of the damaged vehicle, so the Defendant’s act is entirely distinguishable from that of an Agririri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-

3) On January 2014, the Defendant, while residing in an apartment complex, such as the victim, was able to file a complaint against the victim due to insult, etc., and thereafter, it was not good for the Defendant to be in conflict with the victim until around the time of the instant crime. This is sufficient to be a motive for the Defendant to commit the instant crime. 4) The Defendant committed an act, such as attaching a Sticker on the victim’s vehicle without any specific sliding machine, around 05:14, the new wall hour, and the Defendant violated the regulations on the victim’s vehicle.