logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2017.05.30 2016가합203922
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) As to shares of 2/3 of each real estate listed in the Schedule of Attached Property 1.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the real estates listed in the real estate list Nos. 1, 2, and 3 attached Table 1, 2, and 3 owned by the deceased D (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) due to the legacy on February 29, 2016 and March 3, 2016.

The testamentary gift dated February 29, 2016 and March 3, 2016 mean a testamentary gift made by a notary public of March 31, 2014 as No. 80 of the deed 2014, all of which means a testamentary gift made by a notary public of March 31, 2014, and the contents thereof are as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as the “notarial deed of will of this case”). The notary public of this notarial deed was to participate in witness E and F at the request of the deceased and to hear the intent of the will and prepare this deed.

The Deceased bequeathed to the Defendant all of the immovables of this case.

A testator, a witness E, or a F read, and approved the accuracy of the entries of each document and signed and sealed it.

On March 31, 2014, this deed visited the diagnosis room located in Sungnam-gu G in Sungnam-si, the health of the deceased of the testator in accordance with the method of Article 1068 of the Civil Code, in the presence of the doctor in charge, and in the presence of the doctor in charge.

On June 3, 2014, the Plaintiffs filed a petition for adjudication to commence adult guardianship with the deceased as the principal of the instant case as the court 2014Ra621.

On January 6, 2015, this Court commenced adult guardianship for the deceased on the ground that it can be recognized that the deceased has continuously lacking the ability to handle affairs due to mental constraints, and tried to jointly appoint the defendant and the attorney-at-law as an adult guardian for the management of the deceased's property, and as an adult guardian for the guardian for the management of the deceased's property, he/she jointly appointed the defendant and the attorney-at-law as an adult guardian who exercises his/her right to decide on the deceased's personal status, and

On February 29, 2016, the Deceased died with the Defendant and the Plaintiffs as his inheritor.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 12, 13, 14, 29, and Eul evidence Nos. 12 shall include each number, below.

arrow