The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of community service order) on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unfasible and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the defendant by deceiving the victim company and deceiving it under the name of loan, and acting as a broker for loan in return for consideration from the lending user, in light of the crime period, frequency of the crime, the amount of fraud, and the amount of brokerage commission, etc., the crime of this case is not good. It is acknowledged that the defendant has been punished twice due to the defendant's violation of the Act on the Registration of Same Loan Business and the Protection of Financial Users. Meanwhile, the defendant recognized the facts charged of this case and made efforts to recover damage, such as deposit of considerable parts of the profits he acquired on behalf of the victim company and the lending user, etc., the defendant has no criminal record, and there is no other criminal punishment against the accomplice of this case, as well as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and thus, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.