beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 22, 2016, the Defendant was in the D Station E located in Suwon-si C on May 22, 2016, and was in that place.
Along with F (F, 25 years old), the term “AC” was followed by “AC,” and the F used the word “AC,” and used it to open to the public, such as following the F in his hand and exposing the sexual organ to his hand, exposing it to the public, and following the F.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;
1. Article 245 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 245 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. The defendant asserts to the effect that he was in a mental and physical state under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.
In light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court of this case, although the defendant was found to have drinking alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant was found to have been aware of the following facts recognized by each of the above evidence, that is, at the time, the defendant sent the victim to her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her second her her her her her her second her her her her her her her her her her her her her her
Fully considering the fact that the defendant made a statement to the effect that he was placed, it cannot be seen that the defendant had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions under the influence of alcohol, and thus, the above assertion is rejected.
The reason for sentencing was that the defendant, following the victim, openly exposed his or her sexual organ by openly exposing his or her sexual organ, and the crime is not good.
In addition, until now.