1. The plaintiff

A. As to Defendant A’s KRW 135,973,261 and KRW 127,856,070 among them:

B. Defendant B and C are respective networks.

In addition to the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12, on October 14, 2014, the plaintiff extended 9.9% interest rate of 140 million won per annum to defendant A on October 14, 2014, 25% per annum, repayment method principal and interest rate of 25% per annum, repayment method equal repayment, maturity date of 20 October 20, 2018. The defendant Eul, the husband of the defendant A, guaranteed the above debt of the defendant A to the plaintiff (the identity of the defendant A's seal on the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, it is not disputed by the above defendant as to the identity of the defendant's seal Nos. 11 and 12, as well as the whole purport of each statement in Gap evidence No. 11 and 12, the remaining amount of the defendant A's debt was presumed to have been established, and there is no other evidence that the defendant Eul and the defendant Eul 2, 2501, 7615, and 815,25.

According to the above facts, Defendant A is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 135,973,261 won and 127,856,070 won among the principal and 127,856,070 won per annum from June 6, 2015 to the date of full payment. Defendant B and C are obligated to pay for delay damages at the rate of 25% per annum from June 6, 2015 to the date of full payment. Defendant B and C are obligated to pay for delay damages at the rate of 38,849,503 won ( = 135,973,261 won x 2/7) and 36,530,306 won among them ( = 127,856,070 x 2/70 x 2/7) as part of the performance of the guaranteed obligation to the Plaintiff inherited from each network D to the date of full payment.

If so,