1. The Plaintiff’s damage liability against the Defendant does not exist with respect to the accident described in the attached list.

Attached Form

The facts of the accident stated in the list are as follows: (a) there is no dispute between the parties (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”); (b) the Plaintiff asserts that the instant accident was insignificant and did not cause damage to the Defendant vehicle; and (c) the Defendant did not cause damage to the Defendant vehicle; and (d) the Defendant sustained considerable damage to the repair cost due to damage to the Defendant vehicle.

In a lawsuit to confirm the existence of a pecuniary obligation, if the plaintiff, who is the debtor, has made a claim first to deny the fact that the cause of the obligation occurred by specifying the claim first, the defendant, the creditor, bears the responsibility to prove

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 97Da45259, Mar. 13, 1998). There is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant suffered damage due to the instant accident.

(1) The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, since the plaintiff's claim of this case was not presented with any evidence. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, since there is no obligation to compensate for damages against the defendant in relation to the accident of this case.