logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.12.18 2014고단2098
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On August 26, 2014, the Defendant prepared a written statement as a suspect of assault at the police station C in the Pakistan at the time of the strike around 22:25 on August 26, 2014, and deemed the victim D to be suffering from fighting while taking different desire for assault D.

Accordingly, the police officer E (a assistant belonging to the police box) committed an assault, such as committing an act of smuggling, and obstructing the legitimate execution of duties regarding the prevention and suppression of a police officer’s crime. The police officer’s act of assaulting, “I am friend. Chewing, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, and friend, E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

2. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the option of imprisonment;

2. The act of using violence to police officers performing duties to ensure the safety of citizens, maintain social order, investigate cases, etc. on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is an element of sentencing unfavorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, it is an element of sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects the facts charged in the instant case, the fact that the defendant is deemed to have committed a contingent crime by drinking, and there is no record of crime that can be noted in relation

Furthermore, the sentencing data expressed in the arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and criminal records, are taken into consideration equally, and the sentencing guidelines for obstruction of performance of official duties formulated by the Sentencing Committee also

arrow