Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a holder of B 21 ton cargo vehicle.

1. On May 19, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act, driving of the above cargo vehicles around 18:10 on May 19, 2013, and driving at a speed of about 85 km in speed of 3 km in Incheon Nam-gu, Incheon, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, along two lanes.

The driver of any motor vehicle has to take necessary measures so that the loaded freight, etc. can be fastened or fastened in order to avoid falling off the part of the motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle. However, the driver of any motor vehicle has to take necessary measures so that it can be fastened and fastened without neglecting it. The driver of any motor vehicle conflicts with the driver's negligence that proceeds as it is, and the driver's negligence, and the driver's negligence, which led to the collision of the part of the Dopote motor vehicle driven by the victim C (23 years old) who was running in three lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim C’s injury to salt and tension in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and damaged the victim E (the 48-year-old) by the fluor of the damaged vehicle, with approximately two weeks of treatment, the injury to the fluor of the fluoral base and tension, the injury to the victim F (the 23-year-old) who is the fluor of the damaged vehicle, such as salt and tension, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the fluor of the fluoral base and tension that require approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time, the Defendant damaged the victim G (the fluor, the 50-year-old) who is the fluor of the damaged vehicle by destroying the panel fluor of the damaged vehicle, thereby damaging the repair cost of KRW 1,379,700.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the foregoing cargo vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place under the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A E-document;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes by cutting down each fact-finding survey report, photographs, each diagnosis report, estimates, mandatory insurance, and black images of damaged vehicles;

1. Criminal facts;