A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 26, 2019, at around 23:45, the Defendant 23:45, who was locked on the top of a restaurant in Daejeon, and was dispatched after receiving 112 report, solicited the Defendant to return home, and the Defendant expressed that “the victim E (the age of 31) was sprinked to sprinke and sprinked to sprinke” to the victim E, “I am on the house, I am on the house, I am on the house. I am off the sprink used by the victim E, and am on the face of the victim E. I am at once again, and am sprinked to the cell face of the sprinked by the spuckbucker belonging to the police station, and the victim F (the victim F and the victim F) who was 27 years old.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 Reporting Cases and the prevention of crimes, and at the same time, the victim E has damaged the face requiring two weeks of treatment, and the victim F has been placed on the victim F with a base of salt level requiring three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the 112 Reporting Report List, work log in the D District, suspects, and damaged police officers' photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Where an act of violence or intimidation is committed against multiple public officials who perform the same duties as an ordinary concurrent act, multiple crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties are established according to the number of public officials who perform official duties, and the above acts of violence or intimidation were committed in the same opportunity at the same place, and where it is assessed as one act under the social concept, multiple crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties are crimes of conceptual concurrence.

Supreme Court Decision 209 June 25, 2009