The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. The facts charged against Defendant A is a patient who is hospitalized in the “(g) EF convalescent Hospital” located in Busan-gun D.

In fact, the Defendant committed fraud by taking advantage of the fact that the above hospital hospitalized patients with minor injuries or diseases that need not be hospitalized, hospitalized patients for a long time beyond the period of time that actually requires hospitalized treatment, and neglecting without permission outing and staying outside, thereby claiming insurance proceeds even if they do not receive any actual hospitalization.

From February 28, 2014 to August 27, 2014, the Defendant was hospitalized at the above hospital due to the fresh of the fresh of the fresh fresh of the shoulder, the fresh of the fresh, damage to the fresh of the fresh and the fresh, and other damage to the fresh, etc. of the fresh, etc., but the Defendant was not required to undergo hospital treatment due to the lack of pain or inconvenience. In fact, even if the Defendant did not undergo hospital treatment within the above period due to frequent out-of-door and external stay, the Defendant received a certificate of discharge and discharge as if he had undergone hospital treatment within the above period, and received a certificate of confirmation and a receipt of discharge as if he had been receiving hospital treatment within the above period, and then acquired KRW 410,00,000 from April 02, 2014, and received KRW 9,493,197.

2. Determination

1. The defendant's assertion argues to the effect that, in fact, the defendant himself/herself applied for a hurfa, hurf, shoulder hurf, and he/she was hospitalized according to the doctor's instructions, and thus, he/she did not deceiving the victim.

2. Determination of the Defendant’s medical record analysis, medical communication details, etc., a private company, as the main evidence to prove that the Defendant did not have to undergo hospital treatment due to the lack of pain or inconvenience, and that the Defendant did not undergo hospital treatment within the hospitalization period due to frequent out-of-door and out-of-the-door stay, etc.

In the result of the analysis of the records of medical treatment of the "Japan Medical Intelligence Service", the defendant analyzed the records of medical treatment of the defendant, and the opinion of his/her opinion.