logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.01.31 2019고단6149
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 28, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch on July 28, 2008.

On September 17, 2019, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of the C G80 fourth city car owned by B, was driving the said car while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.058% on September 17, 2019, and was driving the said car from the front of the D golf course in the ethical city to the front of the F in the eth of the eth in the eth in the eth in the eth in the eth in the ethic City in the ethic City in the ethic City in the eth of the ethic air from the eth

In this case, as the defendant engaged in driving service is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and there is a motor vehicle driving ahead of the direction, so if the motor vehicle is suddenly stopped, there was a duty of care to secure the safety distance necessary to avoid the collision with the motor vehicle traveling ahead of it and to drive it.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant was negligent in driving while under the influence of alcohol and neglecting this, while driving in front of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle driving in the direction of the vehicle driving, the Defendant’s vehicle behind the victim G (the age of 45) driving, which was stopped pursuant to the new subparagraph, shocked the part of the Defendant’s vehicle driving ahead of the Defendant’s vehicle, and thereby, the Defendant’s vehicle driving in JK5 (the age of 36) driven by the victim I (the age of 5) who was parked in the front part of the vehicle driving.

As a result, the Defendant’s negligence caused the injury to the said G, such as salt, tensions, etc., in light of its duty, and the injury to the victim K (V, 52 years old) who was on the fright car to receive approximately two-day medical treatment, such as climatic salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately two-day medical treatment to the same passenger L (V, 58 years old), and the injury to climatic salt, tensions, and tensions that require approximately two-day medical treatment to the said G.

arrow