beta
Text
1. Defendant B’s KRW 2,119,178 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from May 31, 2013 to April 21, 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. From March 7, 2012, the Plaintiff, who had the nationality of Bangladesh, worked in D, a company run by the Defendant.
B. From May 31, 2013, the Plaintiff participated in the Modern E’s participation of all D employees in the pen of the trade name “F” located in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, for a certain period of two days from May 31, 2013.
C. On May 31, 2013, at around 15:00, the Plaintiff participated in the Gu which is one of the items of the above single rally, and had the other party participated in the area, and had the 4th left-hand balance, thereby causing damage to the neck of the above water area, thereby making it difficult for the Plaintiff to play the role of the debrising. The Plaintiff suffered injury caused by transformation.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.
After the instant accident, Defendant B was diagnosed the Plaintiff as a tree salt, and had the Plaintiff fix the fingers that suffered from an injury on the bablede, but the Plaintiff’s symptoms did not change, and on June 3, 2013, Defendant C was diagnosed as “duplicated damage and deformation of debris control area” by having the Plaintiff receive medical treatment from Defendant C, who is an intention to operate a bable off-type department, as the Plaintiff’s symptoms did not change.
E. Defendant C, as a general rule, filed an appeal for the circumstances that it is difficult for the Plaintiff to be hospitalized or operated as an expected return to Korea, had to treat the Plaintiff as a preserved method, and had the Plaintiff explain the treatment to the Plaintiff, and then had the Plaintiff fixed the place of the treatment to return to Korea on June 25, 2013, following the Plaintiff’s amendment of the plan to return to Korea. As a result, Defendant C, upon receiving treatment and the Plaintiff’s amendment of the plan to return to Korea, provided a total of 26 times medical treatment to the Plaintiff by August 29, 2013.
F. Even after such treatment, the Plaintiff had to undergo the whole and operation of the Plaintiff, and the Defendants continued to receive medical treatment by having all of the Plaintiff “Korea Hospital of the Medical Service Foundation, the Japanese Medical Service Act,” which is a higher medical institution. However, the Plaintiff is entitled to receive medical treatment.